The Harry Potter actress, Emma Watson, looks like Dr. Richard Dawkins, a British ethologist and evolutionary biologist. He is a fellow of New College, Oxford, and was the University of Oxford’s Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995 until 2008.
They look almost like the same person, but I think that there is some Photoshop here, the smile is exactly the same pixel by pixel (and it is Emma’s smile)
Actually it is Emma’s nose and eyes too. . .
Pretty much her whole face has been superimposed onto a portrait of the not so good doctor.
The original Richard Dawkins photo may be seen here.
“Not so good”? He is incredible. A genius of a man, who has made brilliant improvements on showing everyone how backward and foul religion is. He’s incredible… better than a petty actress.
Yes, “Not so good” Karl.
Richard Dawkins is hardly a genius of a man, and he has not said anything about religion that has not been said by others before him. Richard Dawkins is only “incredible” in the lack of credibility that some of his assertions about religion display. Any damned fool can point out how “backward and foul religion” some aspects of religion are but that by no means that God does not exist or that religious people have not also brought considerable benefit to humanity. I could easily point out how “backwards and foul” Stalin was but that would not mean that ALL atheists are “backwards and foul”. No?